# Specification Quality Checklist: Contracts Module (Contratos)

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-08-25
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Source material (`local/scopes/CONTRATOS/*.md`) already resolved open questions through prior refinement rounds — no unresolved business decisions required a [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker. Items explicitly left "at Dev's discretion" (migration algorithm, old-contract mapping strategy) are captured as Assumptions since they are implementation-detail decisions, not scope-affecting ones.
- `/speckit-clarify` session 2026-08-25 resolved two remaining gaps not covered by the source material: SO5-unavailable-during-creation behavior (FR-029a) and Renovar's segmento scope (FR-033, Story 4). Both integrated directly into spec.md; checklist status unchanged (was already all-passing).
- Field-level UI shape (e.g., "Select Multiple", "Radio Buttons") is preserved from source material as it reflects stakeholder-specified interaction design, not a technology choice.
- Re-validated 2026-08-25 after two rounds of `/speckit-plan`/`/speckit-analyze`-driven spec updates: (1) added the optional Non-Functional Requirements section (CNF-01–18, carried over from the source scope doc to resolve dangling references in plan.md/research.md/contracts/tasks.md); (2) rewrote FR-031/FR-036, Edge Cases, Assumptions, and User Stories 4/6/7 to reflect a reversed implementation decision — Renovar/Ampliar/Reduzir carry the contract forward as a new record (previous one deactivated) rather than updating in place, and Cancelar requires a justification. All checklist items re-checked against the updated content and still pass; no new [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers, no measurability regressions (SC-005 was also reworded for clarity during this pass).
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`.